|
Small water supply systems in
the United States typically do not have the
resources or expertise to deal with or counter the
impact of a contamination event or major water
supply disruption. This is especially true of the
media storm that could occur if such an event was
associated with terrorism. The magnitude of this
possibility is much larger than many citizens and
government officials will acknowledge.
There are about 170,000 public
water systems in the United States according to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They are
classified as follows:
-
Very small water systems –
25 to 500 people served
-
Small water systems – 501
to 3,300 people served
-
Medium water systems –
3,301 to 10,000 people served
-
Large water systems –
10,001 to 100,000 people served
-
Very large water systems –
100,001 + people served
Approximately 45,000 of these
water systems are classified as small or very small.
These small water suppliers include towns, small
cities, water districts and municipalities.
Typically, they are headed by a mayor, director,
general manager, city manager or executive manager.
They may be managed by a board of directors or city
council. Security is often provided by the local
police department or state patrol. In many cases
there are fewer than 10 people involved in supplying
water to the consumer. Often, these people do not
have any formal security or media relations
training.
One of these small water supply
systems, Walkerton, Ontario, Canada faced a crisis
in May 2000. This system, supplying 5,000 people,
was contaminated by an E. Coli:O157 and a
Campylobacter jejuni epidemic. In less than a month,
2,300 people were sick and 7 people were dead.
The economic impact on this
small community was staggering. The total cost of
this tragedy was estimated to be at least $64.5
million and if the cost of human suffering is
factored in an estimated $155 million. Each
household in the town spent about $4,000 on average
for system repairs, replacement, cleanup,
decontamination and medical bills as a direct result
of the contamination. The entire water system was
replaced or rebuilt. It cost the town of Walkerton
more than $9 million to repair the water supply
infrastructure.
Additional economic costs
included the following items. Real estate values
dropped a total of $1.1 million. Business costs for
bottled water and disinfecting or replacing
contaminated equipment was estimated at $70,000.
Lost business revenues from May 1, 2000 to April 30,
2001 were estimated at $2.7 million. The Government
of Ontario spent more than $3.5 million in legal
fees and another $1.5 million to supply clean water
to state institutions.
But the worst impact may well
have been the psychological effect on the public.
One of the long term impacts can be seen in the
following comment by a Walkerton resident.
“It could be years before
anyone here turns on a tap without wondering if the
water is safe.”
Walkerton was a small town
where everyone knew everyone else. Many knew those
who died or became seriously ill. Friendships were
severely tested and some were destroyed. Lifelong
friendships were torn apart by the legal battles
that followed when blame was debated in both the
media and the courthouse.
For example, parents of soccer
players from the neighboring towns were afraid the
Walkerton players were infected and could infect
their kids with the deadly bacteria just by talking,
playing or interacting. Even some adults were afraid
of getting too close to coworkers. They did not want
to take the chance.
The Walkerton tragedy continued
to impact the area almost four years after the
event. This incident was the result of operator
error and not premeditated in any way. It was also
not associated with terrorism and happened a year
before the September 11,2001 attack on America.
Because the United States has
the safest water supply system in the world, we tend
to take it for granted. We have very little
understanding or even awareness of the
infrastructure and operating procedures it takes to
make this vital liquid available to us. In our
country, terrorism would be one of the first things
suspected in any water disruption or contamination
incident. This makes most customers of these small
water systems very susceptible to any rumor, media
misquotation or disinformation. As in Walkerton,
local officials would be hard pressed to counter the
impact of such a disruption due to the lack of
public awareness about the infrastructure.
Sincerely
H. Court Young
Geologist, author and publisher
Promoting awareness through the written word
http://www.hcourtyoung.com
*Subscribe
to my Free newsletter
ILLUME - Bringing Timely Issues to Light
& receive a free 3-part mini-course entitled -How
to Prepare for the Coming Energy Crisis-
mailto:illume@getresponse.com*

(303) 726 8320
©March, 2008 |